User Tools

Site Tools


computer_science:chatgpt

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
computer_science:chatgpt [2023/05/24 15:39] – [Improve Output] manacomputer_science:chatgpt [2023/05/26 11:01] (current) – [Improve Output] mana
Line 13: Line 13:
 ===== Improve Output ===== ===== Improve Output =====
 It is possible to get chatgpt to improve its own output by having it argue with itself and iterate its replies: It is possible to get chatgpt to improve its own output by having it argue with itself and iterate its replies:
-> I want you to act as 2 characters. One is the author who wrote the previous reply. The other is the harsh critic who severely criticize the weak points of the previous reply. I want you to write the debate of both of those characters as they work together to improve the result. At the end, I want you to give me the final draft.+> I want you to act as 2 characters. One is the author who wrote the previous reply. The other is the harsh critic who severely criticizes the weak points of the previous reply. I want you to write the debate of both of those characters as they work together to improve the result. At the end, I want you to give me the final draft
 + 
 +Another version of this prompt was generated by chatgpt itself: 
 +> Engage in a dialogue as two distinct characters: the first being the author of the previous response, and the second, a stringent critic who meticulously scrutinizes the weaknesses in the author's reply. The critic should provide constructive criticism, highlighting areas for improvement, while the author should respond by refining their original statement based on the feedback. This iterative process should continue until a significantly improved version of the original response is achieved. The dialogue should conclude with the presentation of this final, polished response.
  
computer_science/chatgpt.txt · Last modified: 2023/05/26 11:01 by mana